[All] Line 9 CPCN permit RESPONSE

Fri Aug 28 17:56:31 EDT 2015

Hello everyone

These emails below are happening right now and please see the attachments too. 
Things look very interesting right now and I have faith good things will come from this. 

Right now I await further response by the NEB. I will keep you updated. 

Louisette Lanteigne700 Star Flower Ave.Waterloo Ont.N2V 2L2 
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Louisette Lanteigne <butterflybluelu at rogers.com>
To: "Anthony, Daniel (OPP)" <Daniel.Anthony at opp.ca> 
Cc: "Gralewicz, John (OPP)" <John.Gralewicz at opp.ca>; "Evans, Shawn (OPP)" <Shawn.Evans at opp.ca>; "peter.watson at neb-one.gc.ca" <peter.watson at neb-one.gc.ca> 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Line 9 CPCN permit

I would also like to point out that In the opening page of the NEB Hearing Order you provided.  It states the following:
"WHEREAS on 21 May 1975, the Board issued Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) OC-30 to Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. (IPL) now Enbridge,"
I would like to state that it does not say to Enbridge Pipeline Inc. It simply states Enbridge. 
Here is the Bloomberg site for Enbridge Pipeline Inc. http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=794447
Here is the Bloomberg site for Enbridge Inc. http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/snapshot/snapshot.asp?ticker=ENB:CN
They have separate boards entirely. They are not the same company.
I spoke with Alberta Securities Exchange solicitor Thakur who confirmed with me that Enbridge Pipeline Inc. is a company. 

Where is evidence to suggest the CPCN is specific to Enbridge Pipeline Inc.?
Louisette Lanteigne

From: Louisette Lanteigne <butterflybluelu at rogers.com>
To: "Anthony, Daniel (OPP)" <Daniel.Anthony at opp.ca> 
Cc: "Gralewicz, John (OPP)" <John.Gralewicz at opp.ca>; "Evans, Shawn (OPP)" <Shawn.Evans at opp.ca>; "peter.watson at neb-one.gc.ca" <peter.watson at neb-one.gc.ca> 
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Line 9 CPCN permit

Dear Mr. Watson. 
You sent me the Line 9 Reason of Decision which is not a certificate.
The CPCN you did provided isn't with Enbridge Pipeline Inc. In fact  Enbridge wasn't even formed until 1988. The company named on the certificate no longer exists.  
Is there any further documents that you can provide to show compliance to the NEB Act section 74 in regards to transfer of assets or acquisitions that may reasonably show a formal transfer of the pipeline ownership in compliance to the NEB Act? 
Thank you for your assistance on this by the way. It is appreciated. 

Louisette Lanteigne700 Star Flower Ave.Waterloo Ont. N2V 2L2
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   ----- Forwarded Message -----
  From: Peter Watson <Peter.Watson at neb-one.gc.ca>
 To: "butterflybluelu at rogers.com" <butterflybluelu at rogers.com>; "daniel.anthony at opp.ca" <daniel.anthony at opp.ca> 
 Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 4:58 PM
 Subject: RE: Line 9 CPCN permit

 #yiv8955260225 -- filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}#yiv8955260225 filtered {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv8955260225  filtered {panose-1:2 4 6 2 5 3 5 3 3 4;}#yiv8955260225 filtered {font-family:Verdana;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv8955260225 p.yiv8955260225MsoNormal, #yiv8955260225 li.yiv8955260225MsoNormal, #yiv8955260225 div.yiv8955260225MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv8955260225 a:link, #yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8955260225 a:visited, #yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8955260225 p.yiv8955260225MsoAcetate, #yiv8955260225 li.yiv8955260225MsoAcetate, #yiv8955260225 div.yiv8955260225MsoAcetate {margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:8.0pt;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225BalloonTextChar {}#yiv8955260225 p.yiv8955260225msochpdefault, #yiv8955260225 li.yiv8955260225msochpdefault, #yiv8955260225 div.yiv8955260225msochpdefault {margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225emailstyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle21 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle22 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle23 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle24 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle25 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle26 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 span.yiv8955260225EmailStyle27 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv8955260225 .yiv8955260225MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv8955260225 filtered {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv8955260225 div.yiv8955260225WordSection1 {}#yiv8955260225 Dear Ms. Lanteigne:    Please find attached Certificate OC-30 and Order AO-001-OC-30 relating to Line 9 and the sale of a 533.4 metre section of the pipeline. For further information with respect to the history of Line 9, please review the Board’s decision in OH-002-2013.     The Board has not taken the view that corporate name changes require applications under the NEB Act: see the Board’s letter of20 April 2015. The Board’s top priorities are the safety of Canadians and the protection of the environment. As the Board noted in its 20 April 2015 letter, corporate name changes do not impinge on the NEB’s effectiveness as a regulator.     Regards,    C. Peter Watson, P. Eng. FCAE Chair and CEO    From: Louisette Lanteigne [mailto:butterflybluelu at rogers.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 10:09 AM
To: Peter Watson; Anthony Daniel (OPP)
Subject: Line 9 CPCN permit   Dear Mr. Watson   I would like to secure a copy of the CPCN permit of Enbridge Pipeline Inc. for Line 9 oil pipeline please.   If you can provide me and Srg. Anthony Daniel of the Ontario Provincial Police with a copy of that document I would greatly appreciate it because currently work is underway in Gananoque to facilitate the hydrostatic testing and I have made repeated inquiries to the NEB to see this document and to date there is no proof this document exists.    I would like this issue addressed in timely manner because work is underway on that pipe. I want to make sure it is legal to do the job.    Thank you very much.   Louisette Lanteigne 700 Star Flower Ave. Waterloo Ont. N2V 2L2 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20150828/f5493593/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NEB_DM_PROD-#454791-v1-OC-30.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 244144 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20150828/f5493593/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Letter_and_Order_AO-001-OC-30_to_Enbridge_Pipelines_Inc._-_A4D7L9.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 58619 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20150828/f5493593/attachment-0001.pdf>