[All] \Keystone poses a major National Security Threat beyond environmental concerns.

[Eleanor Grant]

Hi Lulu -

I hadn't heard that CNOOC had any connection to Huawei, the communications
firm.  Or are you just surmising that if they're both state-owned that's an
actual connection?

Anyway, maybe it's an angle worth pursuing - anything to try to stop
Keystone.  But I think people might need more dots connected.

Eleanor
 On Jan 27, 2013 3:22 AM, "Louisette Lanteigne" <butterflybluelu at rogers.com>
wrote:

> Just sent this along to the the RCMP, Federal Party leaders and I fowarded
> a copy to the FBI as well.
>
> Lulu
>
>   ----- Forwarded Message -----
> *From:* Louisette Lanteigne <butterflybluelu at rogers.com>
> *To:* "thomas.mulcair at parl.gc.ca" <thomas.mulcair at parl.gc.ca>; "
> bob.rae at parl.gc.ca" <bob.rae at parl.gc.ca>; "Elizabeth.May at parl.gc.ca" <
> Elizabeth.May at parl.gc.ca>; "stephen.harper at parl.gc.ca" <
> stephen.harper at parl.gc.ca>; "nsin_risn at rcmp-grc.gc.ca" <
> nsin_risn at rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> *Sent:* Sunday, January 27, 2013 3:17:44 AM
> *Subject:* Keystone poses a major National Security Threat beyond
> environmental concerns.
>
> Keystone XL: National Security Threat
>
> The Keystone XL project is being spearheaded by Trans Canada Pipelines
> Limited and their board members include Nexen. Nexen has recently been
> purchased by Huawei, a state-owned China National Offshore Oil Co.
> In October 2012, a US Congress committee published the results of an
> 11-month investigation into ZTE and Huawei and the alleged risks these
> companies pose to US national security.  The report states Huawei was the subject
> of "credible allegations" of "bribery, corruption, discriminatory
> behaviour and copyright infringement." and stated the firm "cannot be
> trusted."
> The same day shareholders of a Calgary-based energy company agreed to a
> takeover bid of Nexen by Huawei, Canada's spy agency CSIS warned such
> purchases can pose a threat to national security.
>
> If the Keystone XL pipeline is approved, who profits and what risks will
> that pose for both Canada and the US security?
>
> Sources:
> The board members of Trans Canada Pipelines Ltd.
>
> http://investing.businessweek.com/research/common/symbollookup/symbollookup.asp?lookuptype=private&region=all
>
> Info re: US congress committee report
> http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/08/huawei-and-zte-congress-report-draft/
>
> Re. CSIS
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/09/20/nexen-deal-spying-china-csis_n_1901701.html
>
>
> In my view it is highly unreasonable for the Government to continue to
> promote the approval of this pipeline while ignoring warnings provided by
> both Canadian and US National security agencies. To do so, in my view, is
> grounds for Treason.
>
>
> Louisette Lanteigne
> 700 Star Flower Ave.
> Waterloo Ont.
> N2V 2L2
> Canada
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> All mailing list
> All at gren.ca
> http://mail.gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20130127/8ed99ecc/attachment.html>