[All] LRT
Robert Milligan
mill at continuum.org
Wed Nov 18 18:54:34 EST 2009
Hi Michael.
Today I learned that the railways are using the idea of longer rail
bypasses thus enabling trains so as to pass each other at higher
speeds on 1-track lines & thus use the 1-track more efficiently &
effectively!! Besides this idea, I also suggested bypasses at
Stations as LRT's
arrive simultaneously. In each case computer/GPS control systems
are/'would be' used.
Again, my ideal design is a fast 1-track system from Northfield Dr. to
each of the 401 &
'CP Rail line' "ends" of Hespler Rd. Approximately, this would use the
Region's track, Caroline St., the Iron Horse Trail, the 'CN to CP'
spur-line, new track along the CP right-or-way, unused CP track (from
Compounding Factory on Eagle to 401), new track to Hespler Rd, rarely
used CN track to Hespler.
Also, as part of my ideal design, I am suggesting 2 slower 2-track
systems that like in
Portland use the regular roadway & have frequent stops for maximum
building intensification
effect: 1) Starting at Stirling, along Charles to CN tracks HUB then
over to King & upto WLU;
2) Hespler Rd. from 401 to CP rail line.
Because of the very rapid success of the Portland Streetcar in terms
at least of ridership &
building intensification, I can see the Region & W-K-C being able to
justify greater funding
by them (using cheap Bank of Canada loans?) now for the slower
streetcar systems. With
F & P funding mostly for the faster LRT system, I consider my ideal
much-lower-per-kilometer-costing system financially feasible NOW!
I would very much appreciate constructive comments beyond, "I support
the LRT design
as is now proposed by the Region." Though to me, this is somewhat
better than the other easy response, "I support a bus."
Best wishes,
Robert
PS:
1. My ideal design avoids a very costly tunnel/station at King &
Victoria, using the existing
tunnel on the Iron Horse trail under the CN line. I also used the King
St. vehicle bridge to cross the Speed River (instead of a 3 rail-line
bridge);
2) My more "traditional" design includes a 90+ degree flyover over the
CN tracks into a
King/Joseph HUB by the CN tracks & spur-line with 2 tracks going down
Joseph & Church Sts. to Charles at Benton via the existing bus
terminal. Also it would link into the spur-line
at the HUB;
3. I will circulate my article to you in a week or 2 where my ideas
will be clearer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20091118/72f97419/attachment.html>
More information about the All
mailing list