[GREN-Exec] support for Greenbelt document
Kevin Thomason
kevinthomason at mac.com
Tue Jan 26 14:39:37 EST 2021
Hi Greg,
Excellent feedback and I totally agree.
I think that we definitely need to provide feedback from our regional context on the importance of groundwater, wetlands, agriculture, etc. in addition to just stopping urban sprawl as well as mapping feedback.
I can reach out to the groups that you have suggested along with Hold the Line and Ella’s group in Bryant County. Are there other suggestions of who else we could be including?
Cheers,
Kevin.
-------------------------------------
Kevin Thomason
1115 Cedar Grove Road
Waterloo, Ontario Canada N2J 3Z4
Phone: (519) 888-0519
Mobile Phone/WhatsApp: (519) 240-1648
Twitter: @kthomason
E-mail: kevinthomason at mac.com
-----------------------------------------
> On Jan 26, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Greg Michalenko <gcmichalenko at uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
>
> Dear Grenxecutives,
>
> Re: Greenbelt document.
>
> I've gone through the document and think GREN should back it. In some places I think it strays too much into being a publicity document, but it's not productive to quibble at this time. I wish it mentioned the issue of aggregate development as well as residential or industrial issues.
>
> What GREN might comment on as matters develop about expansion proposals is some detailed considerations about how the map of "blue" areas in Waterloo and Wellington was decided and how it could be amended. For instance, there is an east-west strip to the west of KW that is left out of the surrounding blue, and I'm surprised that a blue corridor wasn't proposed along the Grand River upstream of the City of Waterloo. Such a strip would be logical from a scenic/ecological point of view, as well as signifying the original extent of the Six Nations land grant. As this document heads to the next stage as a proposal, perhaps we could suggest some fine tuning to take such issues into account.
>
> The Paris-Guelph moraine act is linked, but it doesn't include a map. I'd like to see one.
>
> Re: getting other groups to back it. Have Waterloo Region Nature, the Nith Valley Ecoboosters, rare Land Trust, Gravel Watch, Six Nations, Wellington Water Watchers, and KW chapter of the Council of Canadians (which seems to be getting very active) signed on or been approached? Also, is the group in Paris that opposed gravel development a possibility?
>
> - Greg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Executive mailing list
> Executive at gren.ca <mailto:Executive at gren.ca>
> http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/executive_gren.ca <http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/executive_gren.ca>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/executive_gren.ca/attachments/20210126/4fb6c520/attachment.html>
More information about the Executive
mailing list