[GREN-Exec] proposed agenda GREN Mar 5, 2020
John Jackson
jjackson at web.ca
Tue Mar 3 13:04:29 EST 2020
Let's give it a try.
John
------------------------------
John Jackson
17 Major Street
Kitchener N2H 4R1
519-744-7503
> On Mar 3, 2020, at 12:56 PM, Susan Koswan <susankoswan at execulink.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks John,
>
> My thinking is that we limit all issue updates and emerging issues to 5 minutes each. Because not everyone is interested in every issue, the networking/socializing time is to give each of us the opportunity to discuss separately from the whole group and figure out what they want to do.
> We could also allot time (15 minutes maybe?) after networking/socializing for everyone to come back with action items for each issue.
> I'm trying to take the onus off the chair to be the heavy-hand on the time-gavel.
> Thoughts?
>
> Susan K
>
> On 3/3/2020 10:59 AM, John Jackson wrote:
>> Susan & Susan
>>
>> Greg's item on the conservation authorities is more than one of the 5 minute updates for the Record guy. It is something that we need to allocate around 15 minutes to for Greg's discussion and for a strategy discussion on how we are going to deal with it. Greg plans to write a brief on our behalf, etc. We may also want to rally our membership to act on it. So this isn't part of the updates. I have no problem with the Record guy being there and hearing that part (hopefully it can lead to a Record story - in addition to Susan's column), but if he is planning on leaving at a set time, we should make sure we get through the other updates first.
>>
>> Also, add an update on the GREN website to the GREN business part. It'll only take two minutes. We are making progress on it.
>>
>> Finally, the GREN business part sounds like non-members may not attend it: "1:00 – 1:15 – for GREN members only." I suspect you are saying that the Record guy won't be coming until 1:15. I don't want to convey to people on our GREN-all list the impression that they can't come if they aren't paid-up members. Or are you saying that this meeting has been advertised beyond our normal GREN-all meeting list and that you don't want to bore other community members with our business? That certainly would be legitimate.
>>
>> Finally, I don't see anything about what we want to do for the next meeting and who will organize it. Am I to read from this that the two Susans will continue to do this?
>>
>> John
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> John Jackson
>> 17 Major Street
>> Kitchener N2H 4R1
>> 519-744-7503
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 6:32 PM, Susan Koswan <susankoswan at execulink.com <mailto:susankoswan at execulink.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi GREN exec,
>>>
>>> I've attached the proposed agenda for this Thursday. Please comment by Tuesday afternoon before I share with all GREN members.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Susan K
>>>
>>> <GREN Agenda Thursday March 5, 2020.docx>_______________________________________________
>>> Executive mailing list
>>> Executive at gren.ca <mailto:Executive at gren.ca>
>>> http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/executive_gren.ca <http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/executive_gren.ca>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/executive_gren.ca/attachments/20200303/3e137c4d/attachment.html>
More information about the Executive
mailing list