<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hi GRENers,</p>
    <p>My column this week, copied and pasted. But please get a
      subscription to the Record if you can afford it. Keep local
      journalism alive. <br>
    </p>
    <p>Susan K<br>
    </p>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.therecord.com/opinion/2020/11/25/provincial-conservatives-playing-risky-game-with-our-conservation-authorities.html">https://www.therecord.com/opinion/2020/11/25/provincial-conservatives-playing-risky-game-with-our-conservation-authorities.html</a></p>
    <h1 class="c-article-headline__heading
      c-article-headline__heading--long">Provincial Conservatives
      playing risky game with our conservation authorities</h1>
    <div class="article__byline__font c-article-header__byline
      article__byline-container-author-withphoto"
      data-lpos="article|author">
      <div class="article__img-container">
        <div class="c-author-badge article-byline__author-badge
          c-author-badge--no-img"><span class="c-author-badge__initials">SK</span></div>
      </div>
      <div class="article__byline"><span class="article__author-by">By </span><span
          class="article__author"><span class="article__author-name
            article__author-name--nolink">Susan Koswan</span><span
            class="article__author-credit">Special to Waterloo Region
            Record</span></span>
        <div class="article__time-container"><span class=""><span
              class="article__published-date">Wed., Nov. 25, 2020</span></span><span
            class="published-date-border"></span><span
            class="article__readtime"><i class="material-icons
              c-material-icon c-material-icon--article-readtime-clock"
              role="img" aria-hidden="true">timer</i><span>3 min. read</span></span></div>
        <div class="article__updated-container"><i class="material-icons
            c-material-icon c-material-icon--article-last-modified"
            role="img" aria-hidden="true">update</i><span
            class="article__updated-time">Article was updated 2 hrs ago
          </span></div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <div class="c-article-body" data-lpos="article|body">
      <div class="c-article-body__content">
        <p class="text-block-container">American linguist Noam Chomsky
          warned that the standard technique of privatization is to
          “defund, make sure things don’t work, people get angry; you
          hand it over to private capital.” </p>
        <p class="text-block-container">So, with conservative
          governments’ penchant for privatization, how worried should we
          be about our conservation authorities? </p>
        <p class="text-block-container"><strong>Defund:</strong>
          Provincial funding for conservation authorities plummeted from
          $50 million in the mid-’90s to an all-time low of $3.58
          million today, downloading funding to municipalities and
          program fees.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container"><strong>Make sure things don’t
            work:</strong> Schedule 6, buried deep within the 260 pages
          of Ontario’s 2021 Budget <a class="text-block__link"
href="https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-42/session-1/bill-229">Bill
            229</a>, proposes changes that would undermine the important
          work of conservation authorities. Tim Gray, executive director
          of Environmental Defence, did not mince words: Schedule 6 was
          “written by the development industry.”</p>
        <p class="text-block-container"><strong>People are angry: </strong>But
          this is not going down without a fight.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">Conservation authorities are
          unique to Ontario. Their mandate is to “undertake
          watershed-based programs to protect people and property from
          flooding and other natural hazards, and to conserve natural
          resources for economic, social and environmental benefits.” </p>
        <p class="text-block-container">Our conservation authorities do
          this well — the Grand River Conservation Authority received
          international recognition for management of the Grand River
          watershed. </p>
        <p class="text-block-container">Schedule 6 in Bill 229 would
          fragment the watershed approach needed for good land-use
          planning. As well, the conservation authorities’ science-based
          authority for reviewing and approving development permits
          could be bypassed by direct requests to the Minister of
          Municipal Affairs and Housing or the local planning tribunal.</p>
        <span style="display:block" id="contentMiddleBreakPoint"></span>
        <p class="text-block-container">We would lose valuable,
          non-political expertise and knowledge on conservation
          authority boards, since all board members would have to be
          municipal councillors. Municipal interests would supersede
          watershed protection. The reality is that watersheds are not
          confined to political borders; we all live upstream and
          downstream from others.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">Schedule 6 would also not cut
          red tape. In a <a class="text-block__link"
            href="https://cela.ca/we-need-our-conservation-authorities-webinar/">webinar</a>
          co-hosted by the Canadian Environmental Law Association,
          Environmental Defence and Ontario Nature, Deborah
          Martin-Downs, the chief administration officer of Credit
          Valley Conservation, outlined the current permit
          application-to-approval process. She shared that 92 per cent
          of permit applications were approved by conservation
          authorities in 2018. That doesn’t sound like a system that’s
          broken.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">If this bill passes and
          conservation authorities are sidestepped in the permit
          process, who would then take responsibility for permit
          compliance and liability for bad decisions? What criteria
          would the ministry use to make data-based decisions?</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">There is no doubt that
          regulations can be at odds with landowners, but they have to
          be; we cannot build or develop whatever we want wherever we
          want. Conservation authorities were created to keep people and
          property safe. Our population has increased substantially
          since they were established and so has our impact. The climate
          crisis has added an extra level of hazard from flooding that
          requires expert management of our water courses, slopes, flood
          plains, wetlands, and buffer zones.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">We do not want to see a return
          to the days before conservation authorities were created in
          the mid-1940s in Ontario. Bad land-use management then led to
          deforestation, erosion and drought. How well we manage our
          land impacts directly on water quality and quantity.</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">This government’s dismantling of
          environmental protection is not going unnoticed by the auditor
          general of Ontario. The recently released <a
            class="text-block__link"
href="https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arbyyear/ar2020.html">2020
            Annual Report</a> is highly critical of the Environment
          Ministry, Natural Resources Ministry, and Municipal Affairs
          Ministry, and Technical Standards and Safety Authority,
          particularly, “the consistent and significant level of
          noncompliance with the Environmental Bill of Rights Act by the
          Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks.”</p>
        <p class="text-block-container">The auditor goes on to say,
          “Biodiversity loss has been ranked as a top-five risk — by
          likelihood and impact — to economies over the next decade.
          Unlike other provinces, Ontario does not have a long-term plan
          or target to expand its network of protected areas.” On the
          contrary, if this government has its way, we also have to
          worry about Schedule 8 in this budget bill that would exempt
          logging from certain provisions in the Endangered Species Act.</p>
        <div data-lpos="in-article-messaging" id="end-of-article"
          class="css-1it0x8c">
          <h3 class="title">Give the gift of trusted news.</h3>
          <div class="text">
            <p>If you refuse to settle for second hand news and think
              that your loved ones shouldn’t either, give them the gift
              of The Record.</p>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </div>
    <p class="text-block-container">The short-term thinking of this
      government is going to cause us all long-term pain.</p>
    <span style="display:block" id="contentEndBreakPoint"></span>
    <p class="text-block-container">Our members of provincial parliament
      need to hear from us. This government’s actions are not in line
      with the public good. Contact your MPP and share your concerns.
      Environmental Defence has made that easy for us through its <a
        class="text-block__link"
href="https://environmentaldefence.ca/newmode/conservation-authorities-need-help/">website</a>.</p>
    <div class="author-endnote-container border-bottom"
      data-lpos="article|author|bottom">
      <div>Susan Koswan is a University of Waterloo graduate with a
        sustainable business management certificate from Conestoga
        College.</div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>