<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp69660dd5yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><span><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Hi folks</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">In a nutshell, Enbridge tried to seek approval for Enbridge Line 10 to sold to be sold to Westover Express without going through a formal NEB hearing process. I fought this issue and implemented case law used in Yaiguaje V. Chevron Corporation to remove the fiscal veil and it worked because I had evidence to support that Enbridge and Westover Express were committing an act of Fraud.</div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">The NEB ruling was just released. They declined to give a permit and demanded that Enbridge go through a full NEB hearing process. They also criticized Enbridge and Westover for trying to keep the fiscal data secret and they declined the request to keep that data confidential. </div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></div><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><div dir="ltr">The ruling can be viewed on the National Energy Board's website at this link:<br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><a href="https://apps.neb-one.gc.ca/REGDOCS/Item/Filing/A95767" style="color: rgb(25, 106, 212); text-decoration-line: underline;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://apps.neb-one.gc.ca/REGDOCS/Item/Filing/A95767 </a></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">So there you go. It didn't take money, it didn't take a group nor did I have to hire any lawyers or have any expertise to get this done. It was a simple process of researching their own data and using it against them. They can't discredit the evidence they produced themselves. If a project is bad, their own data will reveal it. That's all it took. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">It reminds me of this passage written by William Shakespeare </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><p style="margin: 1em 0px 1.3em; color: rgb(31, 31, 31); font-family: open sans, helvetica neue, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px;">Suit the action to the word, the word to the action, with this<br>special observance, that you o'erstep not the modesty of nature:<br>for any thing so o'erdone is from the purpose of playing, whose<br>end, both at the first and now, was and is, to hold as 'twere the<br>mirror up to nature: to show virtue her feature, scorn her own<br>image, and the very age and body of the time his form and<br>pressure.<br></p><cite style="color: rgb(31, 31, 31); font-family: open sans, helvetica neue, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 18px;"><a href="https://www.owleyes.org/text/hamlet/read/act-iii-scene-ii" class="ydpdd6d097owl-eyes-link" style="color: rgb(0, 107, 135); text-decoration-line: underline;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 17–24</a></cite></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Lulu </div></div></span></div></body></html>