<p dir="ltr">You've all been very helpful.</p>
<p dir="ltr">The LRT naysayers just want KW to stay the way it is, and they don't believe all this pop growth will materialize.<br>
But I don't think W Reg has a choice about it - that's what they don't get.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Eleanor<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mar 16, 2014 4:19 PM, "Ginny Quinn" <<a href="mailto:ginnypq@gmail.com">ginnypq@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Yes, Eleanor. The Places to Grow Act ( I was at the local meeting many<br>
years ago HERE at the 'French School House' on Erb St. (Met Kevin T.<br>
there, also David Wellhauser ) The Region agreed to accept 250,000 more<br>
immigrants by the year 2035 (not 2031) (that description is anyone who<br>
is currently NOT living here) from any country...Canada U.S. any other<br>
country qualified by acceptance of our rules citizenship etc. because<br>
the province had enacted the Greenbelt Protection Act.) and needed<br>
somewhere else to 'house' these people. Our Universities and Conestoga<br>
College are a BIG attraction.<br>
<br>
My greatest concern at that time was WATER to feed all these new people,<br>
especially being so heavily dependent on Ground water and the builders<br>
pushing so hard for 'new development land.'<br>
<br>
We had a speaker one time at the Real Estate Board who was a rep. of<br>
ACTIVA and told us that he had been here for a few yrs. looking for<br>
and purchasing more land for them. Activa had been buying land over the<br>
last 50 yrs. and that was 15 yrs. ago that I was at that meeting.<br>
<br>
In our battle we often quoted that "It's like buying a lottery ticket"<br>
there's always a chance that you WON'T WIN .(as in the push of developers to<br>
cross OUR OWN GREENBELT now at the COURTS re OMB.<br>
<br>
You can get more accurate info if you call John Milloy's office (before<br>
he retires) or Kevin Thomas will be a wonderful source of actual<br>
FACTS....Kevin never ceases to amaze me with that busy and factual mind of<br>
his.!!!! Hope this helps ...I'm not sure if I kept the info I picked up<br>
there as I'm trying to clean out as much as I can. We'll soon be<br>
downsizing...and I'm a SAVER....don't like to be called a 'pack rat' but I<br>
do tend to 'save stuff' to help others or refresh this old mind of mine.<br>
Your question took me back many years...thanks for the memories. Ginny<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
From: All [mailto:<a href="mailto:all-bounces@gren.ca">all-bounces@gren.ca</a>] On Behalf Of Eleanor Grant<br>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 12:58 PM<br>
To: GREN2<br>
Subject: [All] a qu re Places to Grow Act<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi All. I thought the Places to Grow Act designated some regions, incl<br>
ours, as having to absorb more ppl, and that that's WHY we have to move<br>
toward intensification here.<br>
<br>
Is this true?<br>
<br>
When the pop of W Reg is forecast to increase by 50% by 2031, is it because<br>
we are a designated region for expansion?<br>
<br>
Just wondering. I can't find any links that aren't pdfs (which I can't read<br>
on my little device).<br>
<br>
Eleanor<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>