<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">A key question:<b style="font-size: 18px; "> IF </b>Prof Lu is correct (see reference to his peer-reviewed paper at<div><a href="http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eqblu/qblu_website/Welcome.html">http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/%7Eqblu/qblu_website/Welcome.html</a> ), then what effects will the exponentially increasing -- eventually runaway -- releases of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH3) have on the atmosphere's chemical ecosystem ? </div><div><br></div><div>Of course tea-party-type American Republicans, big oil-coal-NG, India & China, etc. would advocate/lobby for no significant effect and would want to support Prof Lu's research.</div><div><div><br></div><div><div><div style="text-align: left; ">CFC Climate Change Controversy: How Science Can Get Very Political</div><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/04/cfc-climate-change-study-canada_n_3382906.html">http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/04/cfc-climate-change-study-canada_n_3382906.html</a></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; ">CFC warming theory challenged › News in Science (ABC Science)</div><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/06/03/3773350.htm#.Ua4cixzKxQJ">http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/06/03/3773350.htm#.Ua4cixzKxQJ</a></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; ">Waterloo climate claims raise eyebrows</div><a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Waterloo+climate+claims+raise+eyebrows/8458050/story.html">http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Waterloo+climate+claims+raise+eyebrows/8458050/story.html</a></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; ">Political Animal - No, CFCs are Almost Certainly Not Causing All of Global Warming</div><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_06/no_cfcs_are_almost_certainly_n045048.php">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_06/no_cfcs_are_almost_certainly_n045048.php</a></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; ">Atmospheric science | Earth and Environmental Sciences (their 2 key profs Sloan & Lin are gone?)</div><a href="https://uwaterloo.ca/earth-environmental-sciences/research/atmospheric-science">https://uwaterloo.ca/earth-environmental-sciences/research/atmospheric-science</a></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; "><div style="text-align: left; ">Abundance the Book - by Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler — Abundance - the Future is Better Than You Think - is a new book by Peter Diamandis and Steven Kotler. Official Abundance the Book website. (<b>Now for the optimistic side!</b>)</div><a href="http://www.abundancethebook.com/">http://www.abundancethebook.com/</a></div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: left; ">Abundance economics</div><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_(economics)">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_(economics)</a></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="text-align: left; "><br></div><div style="text-align: left; ">PS: <b>World Extinction by CO2 (& CH3), etc. induced H2S</b></div><div style="text-align: left; ">What about the possibility that the changing chemical nature of the oceans -- caused by absorbed atmospheric CO2 (from combustion) forming carbonic acid (H2CO3), world runoffs of phosphorous and nitrogen compounds from hi-carbon-energy chemical farming and sewage treatment plants, etc. -- subsequently causing anoxia then massive oceanic super-toxic hydrogen sulphide (H2S) emissions from dead plant and animal life, and H2S bacteria (in an ideal chemical environment for them).</div><div><br></div><div style="text-align: left; ">Global Warming Led To Atmospheric Hydrogen Sulfide And Permian Extinction (combine with collaborative modern causes listed above)</div><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/02/050223130549.htm">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/02/050223130549.htm</a></div><div><br></div></div></div></body></html>