<div>I support it, if by point # 2 you mean that they should implement the crosstown express buses BEFORE building Light Rail, rather than delaying the buses as they recently announced. This is key.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Eleanor Grant<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">2011/4/29 Norah & Richard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nrchaloner@hotmail.com">nrchaloner@hotmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">Hello All,<br><br> I support the motion as presented but if changes are to be made would favour Susan K's suggestion that St Jacob's may not be the best place to start because of its 2 day congestion compared to the southern daily traffic. If there are further changes to your position, I add my support to the majority of a group decision. You have put an enormous amount of effort into this and I am unfamiliar with the complexities since I do not live and use the existing routes. Your combined intelligence is stellar and should help to move this forward. Norah <br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>On 28/04/2011 9:53 PM, Caterina Lindman wrote: </div></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5">Hi everyone. I'm sorry I missed the meeting on Wednesday. It sounds like you had an interesting discussion about the transit proposals that the Region is considering. CREW (Community Renewable Energy of Waterloo) have issued a <a href="http://www.crewzone.ca/pubs/release_CREW_transit_study_2011-03-10.pdf" target="_blank">press release</a> and a <a href="http://www.crewzone.ca/pubs/rpt_CREW_Transit_Options_2011-03-10.pdf" target="_blank">research paper</a> that I found helpful and inspiring. The research paper is an easy-to-read comparison of different transit options. The conclusion of their study is that Aerorail would be the best option because it can be implemented at a relatively low cost, without having to disrupt as much of the current infrastructure.<br>
<br>I can support the motion you have presented, if in item 4), by new technologies, we include above-grade suspension rails, ie Aerobus or Aerorail. <br><br>CREW's recommendation is to build an Aerorail pilot project from Laurier to University of Waterloo to R&T Park, at the cost of approximately $50 M. My experience with the I-express is that hardly anyone gets on or off at R&T park, so the pilot should perhaps include McCormick arena as well to serve a lot of student transportation needs. <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:41 AM, John Jackson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jjackson@web.ca" target="_blank">jjackson@web.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">
<div><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Last night at the GREN meeting we discussed what position GREN should take on the current light rail transit proposal before Waterloo Regional Council. The Council will be making a decision on June 15 and will be holding public input sessions to hear from delegations prior to that.<br>
<br>After an hour of discussion, the following motion was made as a position that we should take to Regional Council:<br>GREN Motion: 1) Urge Region to adopt a combination of L9 & L3 (the administration’s recommendation to council). [this means that they commit now to having a light rail train system all the way from St. Jacob’s farmers market to the Ainslie Street bus terminal in Cambridge (L9), but that they begin by having rail only from St. Jacob’s farmers market to Fairview Mall and Bus rapid transit to Cambridge (L3); 2) Urge Region to now commit to and immediately begin rapidly implementing a reformed bus system throughout the three communities, with new Express Bus Routes and new local bus route system as shown on page 10 of their “Connecting to the Future” document; 3) integrate this with a reassessment of the road system needs given that the bus and rail system is dramatically improved; 4) while the details of the LRT system are being developed over the next two years, that they continue to explore new technologies; and 5) ensure that planning policies are implemented (as described in the Region’s new official plan) that will support the transit system.<br>
<br>This motion was passed, but was not passed unanimously. Therefore, we decided to ask our paid-up GREN members who were not present last night to vote on the motion to bring us to a decision.<br><br>Please send me your vote by Sunday May 1. I have also attached the Region’s information handout that explains L9, L3 and has the page 10 map referred to in the motion.<br>
<br>Thanks for your immediate attention to this matter.<br><br>John<br>-- <br>John Jackson<br>17 Major Street<br>Kitchener, Ontario N2H 4R1<br><a href="tel:519-744-7503" target="_blank" value="+15197447503">519-744-7503</a><br>
<br></span></font></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div><pre><fieldset></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
All mailing list
<a href="mailto:All@gren.ca" target="_blank">All@gren.ca</a>
<a href="http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca" target="_blank">http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca</a>
</pre></blockquote><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>All mailing list<br><a href="mailto:All@gren.ca">All@gren.ca</a><br><a href="http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca" target="_blank">http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>