<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">FYI -- sorry for the oversight, but I intended to include GREN as a Cc to Paul<br><div><br><div>Begin forwarded message:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><font face="Helvetica" size="3" color="#000000" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000"><b>From: </b></font><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Robert Milligan <<a href="mailto:mill@continuum.org">mill@continuum.org</a>></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><font face="Helvetica" size="3" color="#000000" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000"><b>Date: </b></font><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">September 10, 2010 11:05:58 AM GMT-04:00</font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><font face="Helvetica" size="3" color="#000000" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000"><b>To: </b></font><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Paul Langan <<a href="mailto:plangan107@yahoo.com">plangan107@yahoo.com</a>></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><font face="Helvetica" size="3" color="#000000" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; color: #000000"><b>Subject: </b></font><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica"><b>Re: Cambridge Times Article: "$265M fed funding for LRT"</b></font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; min-height: 14px; "><br></div> </div><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Paul,</div><div><br></div><div>In order to respect the privacy of your specific communication (see below) but to give you credit as the ''in effect" source, I expressed it the way I did. Were you below not referring to the article that I referenced? If you were, why the fuss?!! And to be very precise, I did not actually say that you sent me the article. But I do very much appreciate the reference. And if you are saying that you were referring to an even better article, then please let me know very specifically so that we don't mess up the intended message.</div><div><br></div><div>Keep up your excellent rail transportation public interest work.</div><div><br></div><div>Robert (Creatively tough but fair & reasonable)</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On 10-Sep-10, at 8:52 AM, Paul Langan wrote (<b>after receiving a bcc version</b>):</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="position: static; z-index: auto; "><tbody><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit; ">how about Vrbanics piece that was "special" to cambridge times. <br><br>--- On <b>Wed, 9/8/10, Robert Milligan <i><<a href="mailto:mill@continuum.org">mill@continuum.org</a>></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px; position: static; z-index: auto; "><br>From: Robert Milligan <<a href="mailto:mill@continuum.org">mill@continuum.org</a>><br>Subject: Burrett's Irrational LRT-hate Relationship<br>To: "* GREN" <<a href="mailto:all@gren.ca">all@gren.ca</a>><br>Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 10:38 PM<br></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><div>On 10-Sep-10, at 10:24 AM, Paul Langan wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">I didnt send you that article........<br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 9/10/10, Robert Milligan <i><<a href="mailto:mill@continuum.org">mill@continuum.org</a>></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Robert Milligan <<a href="mailto:mill@continuum.org">mill@continuum.org</a>><br>Subject: Cambridge Times Article: "$265M fed funding for LRT"<br>To: "* GREN" <<a href="mailto:all@gren.ca">all@gren.ca</a>><br>Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 7:04 AM<br><br><div id="yiv1620126332">Hi All,<div><br></div><div>This article (thanks to Paul Langan) that that captures a few more comments from local leaders. Notice that Ken Seiling is still trying to justify the exclusion of Cambridge (BRT only 'til 2036+?) despite <b>Cambridge's inclusion being so necessary. (Why? To give the LRT sufficient length to make it sufficiently useful to middle class drivers who live in KW but work in Cambridge and vice versa!) </b> Doug Craig in response to Ken's (not sufficiently thought out) position is in effect saying (for fairness sake), if we don't get LRT, then KW shouldn't either -- especially with Cambridge taxpayers helping to pay for it (no benefit, no taxes)!</div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cambridgetimes.ca/news/local/article/869209--265m-fed-funding-for-lrt">http://www.cambridgetimes.ca/news/local/article/869209--265m-fed-funding-for-lrt</a></div><div><br></div><div>Robert </div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br> </blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>