[All] Responsibility for fish and fish habitat along pipeline route handed over to National Energy Board

[Susan Koswan]

http://nwcoastenergynews.com/2014/01/10/5626/dfo-hands-fisheries-protection-
pipelines-neb/

 

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans has handed responsibility for fish
and fish habitat along pipeline routes over to the National Energy Board.
The same agreement also gives the National Energy Board responsibility for
dealing with First Nations fisheries if a pipeline or power line crosses
their traditional territory.

DFO and NEB quietly announced a memorandum of agreement on December 16,
2013, that went largely unnoticed with the release three days later of the
Joint Review Panel decision on Northern Gateway and the slow down in news
coverage over the Christmas holidays.

As of December 16, 2013,  Enbridge no longer has to apply to DFO for permits
to alter fish habitat along the Northern Gateway route. It was also on
December 16 that Kinder Morgan filed its application with the NEB for the
expansion of its pipeline from Alberta to Burnaby.

Fish and fish habitat along those pipeline is now the responsibility of the
Alberta-based, energy friendly National Energy Board.

On its website, the NEB says
<http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rpblctn/ctsndrgltn/mmrndmndrstndng/fshrscn
scnd2013_12_16-eng.html> 

Applications submitted to the NEB shall be reviewed under the Fisheries
Protection Provisions of the Fisheries Act to determine if impacts shall
occur, and if an authorization will be required under the Fisheries Act. The
NEB shall also become responsible to determine if proposed projects will
impact aquatic species at risk and require permitting under the Species at
Risk Act. If the NEB determines than an authorization or permit will be
required, DFO shall be notified and will be responsible for issuing the
authorization or permit.

This MOU better integrates the Government of Canada's initiative to
streamline application processes by eliminating the requirement for
duplicate reviews.

In the "Guiding Principles" of the memorandum of understanding between DFO
and NEB, the first provision is

The Parties will use the provisions of this MOU to support the Government of
Canada's regulatory process improvement objectives through coordination to:
Facilitate effective and efficient use of government resources in order that
regulatory decisions are made in a timely manner by applying a one-project
one-review approach;
Promote clarity and consistency of the regulatory decision making process;
and
Ensure responsibilities for mitigation, monitoring and reporting, compliance
and enforcement, follow-up monitoring, and Aboriginal consultation are
addressed.

Protecting fisheries and fish habitat is only the third priority in the MOU

Conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat, and listed aquatic
species at risk and their critical habitat, will be managed in accordance
with DFO's regulatory and policy frameworks for the application of the
fisheries protection provisions of the Fisheries Act and SARA [Species at
Risk Act] respectively.

The question most people on the northwest coast and along BC's rivers will
ask (whether or not they support or oppose pipeline projects): Just how much
expertise, if any, in fisheries and fish habitat can be found in the Calgary
offices of the National Energy Board?

According to the FAQ
<http://www.neb-one.gc.ca/clf-nsi/rpblctn/ctsndrgltn/mmrndmndrstndng/fshrscn
scnd2013_12_16q-eng.html>  posted on the NEB website, it is now up to the
NEB to determine whether a project impacts fisheries or species at risk.

How will the MOU affect authorizations under the Fisheries Act?

The NEB will assess a project application and determine if mitigation
strategies are needed to reduce or prevent impacts to fish or fish habitat.
If the project could result in serious harm for fish then the NEB will
inform DFO that a Fisheries Act authorization under paragraph 35(2)(b)  is
likely to be required. DFO will review and issue an authorization when
appropriate, prior to project construction. Authorizations issued by DFO
would relate to those watercourses impacted, not the entire project.

How will the MOU affect permits under SARA?

The NEB will assess a project application for potential impacts to aquatic
species at risk. If an impact to a SARA-listed aquatic species may occur,
the NEB will inform DFO.  DFO will review and issue a permit under SARA when
appropriate, prior to project construction.

The NEB claims that the MOU will not affect environmental protection

Will this MOU reduce environmental protection?

No, the NEB has always considered impacts to fish and fish habitat and
aquatic species at risk when making its decisions. The initial assessment of
impacts of federally regulated pipeline and power line projects

 

Another potentially troubling aspect of the agreement is that it makes the
National Energy Board the lead agency in dealing with First Nations.

when the Crown contemplates conduct that may adversely affect established or
potential Aboriginal and treaty rights in relation to the issuance of
authorizations under the Fisheries Act, and/or permits under SARA, the NEB
application assessment process will be relied upon by DFO to the extent
possible, to ensure Aboriginal groups are consulted as required, and where
appropriate accommodated;

 

Canada's First Nations have dealt with DFO for generations and by and large
both sides understand each other's aims, even if they don't always agree.
The NEB, however, at least as seen during the JRP hearings, often showed
little understanding or respect for First Nations.  That means that already
troubled relationship between First Nations and the Crown over pipelines is
going to get a lot more troubled.

 

The memorandum of understanding between DFO and MOU is yet another result of
the Harper government's omnibus bills, which have the aim of efficiently
approving energy projects while downplaying environmental costs.

It also means that from now on there must be a much more careful reading of
the 209 conditions imposed by the Joint Review Panel on Enbridge to see if
those conditions are actually going to be rigorously enforced or if all
Enbridge has to do is to file reports with the NEB.

It also appears that the new and highly restrictive NEB procedures that
restrict input from all but those the NEB considers "directly affected' by a
project will also apply to their new responsibility for fisheries.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20140115/aa058df4/attachment.html>