[All] junk mailboxes?

[randybmclean at rogers.com]

Mail has changed.  I do not want junk mail and that is considered every
piece of mail  put in my box without my name on it.  That mail does not get
into the system through corner drop boxes.  It does not pay the full price
and, as a marketing tool, I have no use for it.  It is unnecessary weight,
time spent, paper wasted, environmentally degrading JUNK!

 

Over 80 per cent of the weight of mail I receive in my box is JUNK!.  That
means it never went through a drop box.  Relative to 15  years ago I use the
mail system less than 20 per cent than what I did then.  I invoice only by
email, I pay over 80 per cent of my bills via the internet and I am paid
through direct deposit with confirmation through the internet.  More direct
deposits will come when the need arises and that need has come and the
postal system, when returning back to work, will find less REAL mail to
deliver and need to compensate that volume with cheap JUNK!

 

The only reason the government is legislating them back to work is to
protect them from themselves.  Also for those elderly people who do not have
internet access, have not been able to switch over, rely on their government
cheques, and who make up the majority of voters.

 

 

 

 

From: all-bounces at gren.ca [mailto:all-bounces at gren.ca] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: June-23-11 7:03 AM
To: Susan Koswan; 'gren'
Subject: Re: [All] fewer mailboxes?

 

I agree with S Lachance on this one.  There has already been a major
reduction over the past 15 years with the availability of mailboxes.  GREN
is supposed to be about the environment.  If you have to drive around to
find a mailbox that is in the area in which you are travelling, that uses
more gas.  They certainly are not at the bus stops either.  Many times I
have a letter (business and personal) in my car for days because I couldn't
find one originally and I end up forgetting about the envelope in the back
seat.  Most main streets on my daily trk do not have the boxes because
planners don't want traffic stopping.

 

Jan

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Susan Koswan <mailto:susankoswan at execulink.com>  

To: 'gren' <mailto:all at gren.ca>  

Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:27 PM

Subject: [All] fewer mailboxes?

 

Does anyone have comments/concerns about Canada Post reducing the number of
mailboxes? John, do you want to respond to Helen or should I? 

 

My initial thoughts are that people are using snailmail less, so it seems
justified. I think mailboxes need to be more conveniently located where
people would normally be going anyway - like grocery stores etc. How many
people currently make special trips to the  mailbox nowadays? It seems like
an activity that is built-in with other errands. 

 

Let me know, ASAP,

Thanks,

Susan K 

 

I'm writing a story about Canada Post removing 45 mailboxes in KW (ours on
McGarry is leaving.) While this is less stops for the Canada Post truck and
saves them money, I'm concerned more people will drive to a mailbox now. Our
nearest one is going to be at the Westheights plaza.

 

Do you want to ponder this and give me a call tomorrow?

 

Helen

Helen Hall 

Publisher/Editor

Kitchener Citizen - West Edition

519-741-5892

519-404-3593 (cell)

 

Visit us at www.kitchenercitizen.com and read us online! Just click on the
front page of either edition to download.

 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
All mailing list
All at gren.ca
http://gren.ca/mailman/listinfo/all_gren.ca

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3719 - Release Date: 06/22/11

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gren.ca/pipermail/all_gren.ca/attachments/20110623/dbc99293/attachment.html>